Global Vision Law Firm represents clients before the Supreme Court of India - handling Special Leave Petitions, writ petitions, public interest litigation, review and curative petitions, and transfer petitions. Led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed, our team gives every case a free preliminary assessment before advising on the path forward.
The Supreme Court of India is the final forum for justice under the Constitution - the place litigants turn to when every other avenue has been exhausted. Reaching it, however, is itself a demanding exercise: a large share of Special Leave Petitions are dismissed at the very first hearing, simply because the matter fails to disclose a substantial question of law or a serious enough injustice.
Global Vision Law Firm's approach begins with an honest evaluation of a case's actual chances before the Supreme Court - not a blanket promise of success. Our team researches each matter thoroughly, identifies the precise legal question worth arguing, and works with empanelled Advocates-on-Record to ensure filings meet the Court's exacting procedural standards.
From the first assessment through drafting, filing, listing, and arguments before the Bench - our experienced Supreme Court advocates in Delhi stay closely involved at every stage of the case.
Because so many petitions are dismissed at the admission stage, Global Vision Law Firm offers a free preliminary assessment of whether a matter genuinely raises a substantial question of law suited to Supreme Court intervention - so clients can decide with clear expectations rather than false hope.
Limitation periods for filing an SLP or Review Petition run from the date of the impugned order and are strictly enforced. Approach a Supreme Court lawyer in Delhi as soon as possible after an unfavourable High Court or tribunal order - call +91 9599801188.
Our advocates support clients through every recognised route by which a matter may reach the Supreme Court of India, working alongside experienced Advocates-on-Record where the Court's rules require it.
We identify whether a case genuinely raises a substantial question of law before recommending Supreme Court proceedings, rather than filing petitions with little realistic chance of admission.
SLPs, writs, PILs, review and curative petitions each demand a different drafting approach - our team frames the specific legal question each remedy requires.
Where a client already has counsel at the High Court or trial stage, we work alongside that counsel and the empanelled Advocate-on-Record to bring the matter to the Supreme Court smoothly.
Where a matter genuinely requires urgent relief - such as bail or a stay against irreversible harm - we pursue mentioning before the Bench for early listing.
We provide a written fee estimate after the free preliminary assessment, so clients understand the likely cost before committing to Supreme Court proceedings.
Every recognised route to the Supreme Court of India, handled by our experienced advocates in Delhi.
SLPs under Article 136 against civil orders of High Courts and tribunals, including property, commercial, matrimonial, and service matters.
SLPs against criminal orders including bail decisions, acquittals, convictions, and sentencing - across all stages of criminal proceedings.
Direct petitions to the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights, without requiring a prior order from a lower forum.
PILs addressing matters of genuine public concern and fundamental rights violations affecting a wider class of people, filed under Article 32.
Petitions asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its own judgment on limited grounds, generally filed within 30 days of the judgment.
The final, exceptional remedy after a Review Petition is dismissed, reserved for the rarest cases of gross miscarriage of justice.
Proceedings for wilful non-compliance with a Supreme Court order or judgment, pursued to enforce the Court's directions.
Petitions seeking transfer of a case, or matrimonial proceedings in particular, from one court to another where fairness or convenience so requires.
Coordination with empanelled Advocates-on-Record to ensure every filing meets the Supreme Court's procedural rules and formatting requirements.
Urgent bail and anticipatory bail applications before the Supreme Court where relief has been denied at the High Court level.
Appeals in company, tax, consumer, and commercial disputes reaching the Supreme Court from tribunals such as the NCLAT and NCDRC.
Transfer petitions and appeals in matrimonial and family law matters, including maintenance, custody, and divorce proceedings reaching the apex court.
From the first assessment to arguments before the Bench, here is how our Supreme Court advocates carry a matter forward.
Call +91 9599801188 to discuss your order or grievance. We assess whether the matter raises a substantial question of law suited to Supreme Court intervention.
We gather certified copies of the impugned order and the underlying petition or suit, ensuring everything is properly translated and formatted for filing.
We draft the SLP, writ petition, or other remedy, framing the precise legal question that justifies the Supreme Court's intervention.
The petition is filed through an empanelled Advocate-on-Record, as required under Supreme Court rules, with all procedural formalities completed.
We pursue listing - including urgent mentioning where genuinely warranted - and argue for admission of the petition before the Bench.
Once admitted, we prepare and argue the matter through subsequent hearings, coordinating closely with senior counsel where engaged.
We explain the judgment's implications clearly and advise on next steps, whether implementation, compliance, or further proceedings.
Where genuine grounds exist, we assess and pursue a Review Petition, and in the rarest cases, a Curative Petition thereafter.
To evaluate and file a matter before the Supreme Court, we typically need the following:
If you already have a lawyer handling your matter at the High Court or trial stage, Global Vision Law Firm can work alongside them to bring the case to the Supreme Court, rather than requiring you to start from scratch with an entirely new team.
Our Supreme Court practice spans the full range of matters that reach the apex court, including:
Founder & Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed across Delhi's courts and India's highest forums.
Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey is the Founder and Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm - with 13+ years of litigation experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed across Delhi's courts. A graduate of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, he leads the firm's Supreme Court practice, working closely with empanelled Advocates-on-Record on Special Leave Petitions, writ petitions, and appeals arising from the firm's criminal, civil, corporate, and matrimonial matters. Known for giving clients an honest assessment of their case's merits before the apex court, Adv. Dubey and his team are regularly sought by clients across Delhi NCR who have exhausted relief at the High Court level.
Associate Advocate with 6+ years supporting Special Leave Petitions and bail matters at the Supreme Court, alongside criminal litigation across Delhi's courts.
Associate Advocate with 6+ years supporting civil appeals, transfer petitions, and NCLAT-related Supreme Court matters before the apex court.
13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed across Delhi's courts and India's highest forums.
Real outcomes - petitions admitted, relief granted, matters resolved at India's highest court.
"After losing at the High Court, we were told our chances were slim. Global Vision Law Firm gave us an honest assessment, framed the legal question carefully, and our SLP was not only admitted but a stay was granted within weeks.
GKGaurav K.SLP Admitted & Stay Granted, Supreme Court
"Our bail application was rejected at the High Court in a serious matter. The team moved quickly to the Supreme Court, and my brother was granted bail after a well-argued hearing. Grateful for their prompt action.
JGJai G.Bail Granted, Supreme Court of India
"We filed a Review Petition after an unfavourable commercial judgment, on genuine grounds of an error apparent on the record. The team's careful drafting led the Court to reconsider a key finding in our favour.
BJBhumi J.Review Petition, Commercial Matter
Common questions about SLPs, writ petitions, review petitions, and Supreme Court practice.
Global Vision Law Firm is led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey - Founder and Managing Partner with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. The firm assists clients through every stage of Supreme Court practice, from evaluating a case's merits to drafting, filing, listing, and arguing SLPs, writ petitions, and appeals.
A Special Leave Petition under Article 136 is the primary route to appeal an order of a High Court, tribunal, or other authority to the Supreme Court. It asks the Court for special permission to hear the matter, typically granted where the case raises a substantial legal question or involves a serious injustice by the lower forum.
Only an Advocate-on-Record is authorised to file and sign pleadings before the Supreme Court - a distinct qualification requiring a special examination and supervised training. A litigant's regular lawyer typically works with an empanelled Advocate-on-Record to properly file and progress the matter.
An SLP challenges an order already passed by a High Court or tribunal and requires the Court's permission to be heard. A Writ Petition under Article 32 is a direct remedy for violation of fundamental rights, requiring no prior order - it can be the first proceeding on the issue.
Listing timelines vary considerably depending on the matter's nature and current pendency. Urgent matters - such as bail or a stay against irreversible harm - can be listed within days through mentioning, while ordinary matters may take weeks to months for a first hearing.
A Review Petition under Article 137 allows a party to ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its own judgment, generally within 30 days, on limited grounds such as an error apparent on the record or discovery of important new evidence - not simply disagreement with the outcome.
A Curative Petition is an exceptional remedy available after a Review Petition is dismissed, used only in the rarest cases to prevent a gross miscarriage of justice or violation of natural justice. It is heard by the Court's most senior judges and granted only in extremely limited circumstances.
Yes - a PIL can be filed directly under Article 32 where the matter involves a fundamental rights violation affecting the public at large, rather than a purely private grievance. Frivolous petitions dressed up as PILs are routinely dismissed.
Fees vary based on counsel seniority, matter complexity, and urgency. Global Vision Law Firm offers a free preliminary assessment of a case's merits before quoting a transparent, written fee estimate - call +91 9599801188.
Facing an adverse order or a matter that needs the Supreme Court's attention? Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years, 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. Free preliminary consultation. Call now.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking the "Agree" button and accessing this website, the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members. Also, the information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
Agree Decline