Global Vision Law Firm drafts Section 8 demand notices, files Section 9 IBC petitions and defends them before the NCLT in Delhi, through admission, CIRP and NCLAT appeal. Led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed, we act for suppliers, contractors, service providers, employees and corporate debtors, including in high-value, complex matters.
Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 lets an operational creditor apply to the NCLT to start the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a corporate debtor that has not paid an undisputed operational debt of Rs 1 crore or more. It is filed in Form 5, after a Section 8 demand notice has gone unanswered for 10 days.
Operational debt arises from the supply of goods or services, including employment. Suppliers, contractors, transporters, consultants and employees are the usual operational creditors. Where a company simply does not pay a clear, undisputed invoice, Section 9 is a strong lever.
Because admission triggers a moratorium and passes control to an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Section 9 gives creditors real pressure, and exposes debtors to real risk. The petition lives or dies on two things: a clean demand notice and the absence of a pre-existing dispute.
If the buyer genuinely disputed quality, quantity or price before your notice, the NCLT will usually reject the petition. Before filing, we test your claim for any dispute trail in emails, complaints and replies, and advise on the better forum if one exists.
Any person owed an operational debt can be an operational creditor. Classifying the claim correctly is the first legal check.
Sellers of raw materials, goods, equipment or components owed unpaid invoices by a company.
Construction, infrastructure and project contractors owed running bills, milestone and retention payments.
IT, logistics, manpower, consultancy and professional service providers with unpaid fees.
Unpaid wages, salary and employment dues are operational debt, subject to the minimum default.
Dues payable under any law to the Central or State Government or a local authority also fall in the definition.
Several operational creditors can combine their dues against the same corporate debtor to cross the Rs 1 crore threshold.
A bank, NBFC, lender or home buyer owed a financial debt files under Section 7, not Section 9. We check the nature of the debt first. See our page on IBC Section 7 financial creditor petitions.
Before a Section 9 petition can be filed, the operational creditor must serve a demand notice under Section 8. It can be a notice in Form 3, or a copy of the unpaid invoice with a notice in Form 4. The notice must state the amount due and the demand for payment.
The corporate debtor has 10 days from receipt to do one of two things: pay the debt, or bring to the creditor's notice the existence of a dispute or a pending suit or arbitration filed before the notice. If neither happens, the creditor can file under Section 9.
Wrong amount, wrong address, a notice that is not in the prescribed form or no proof of delivery are common reasons for rejection. We draft and serve the notice with tracked, provable delivery.
A Section 8 notice is a warning, not yet a petition. A timely, accurate reply can stop a Section 9 application before it starts.
Section 9(3) lists the documents that must accompany Form 5. Missing items cause delay or rejection, so we build the file before filing.
Tax invoices, work orders or purchase orders that establish the operational debt and the amount claimed.
Delivery challans, e-way bills, acceptance certificates, measurement sheets or completion certificates.
Section 8 notice in Form 3 or 4, with postal, courier or email delivery records.
Affidavit that no notice of dispute has been received from the corporate debtor.
Certificate from the financial institution maintaining the creditor's account confirming that the debt is unpaid.
Ledger confirmations, balance confirmations, TDS entries and emails acknowledging the dues. These also help on limitation.
From unpaid invoice to admission and CIRP, here is how our NCLT lawyers in Delhi carry a Section 9 matter.
We examine the debt, dates, communications and any complaint trail, and check for a pre-existing dispute and for limitation.
We advise whether CIRP is right, or whether a commercial summary suit, arbitration or the MSME Facilitation Council fits better.
We prepare the notice in the prescribed form and serve it with provable delivery to the registered office.
We watch for a reply, a notice of dispute or payment, and assess whether the window has closed cleanly.
We compile the documents under Section 9(3), the affidavit and bank certificate, and file before the NCLT bench with jurisdiction over the registered office.
The NCLT admits or rejects within 14 days of receipt. If defects are found, 7 days are given to rectify. We argue for admission, or for rejection when defending.
On admission, the moratorium starts, the IRP takes charge and creditors file claims in response to the public announcement.
We represent the creditor or debtor through CIRP, negotiate settlements, and file or defend appeals before the NCLAT.
| Stage | Statutory reference | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Demand notice served | Section 8(1) | Starts the 10-day period |
| Debtor reply: pay or dispute | Section 8(2) | 10 days from receipt |
| File application if no payment or dispute | Section 9(1) | After expiry of 10 days |
| Admit or reject | Section 9(5) | 14 days from receipt |
| Rectify defects after notice | Proviso to Section 9(5) | 7 days |
| Communicate order to parties | Section 9(6) | 7 days from admission or rejection |
| Appeal to NCLAT | Section 61 | 30 days, plus up to 15 days |
| Appeal to Supreme Court | Section 62 | 45 days |
The most common reason a Section 9 petition fails is a pre-existing dispute. If a real dispute about the debt existed before the demand notice, or a suit or arbitration on the same subject was already pending, the NCLT will usually not admit the petition. The Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software held that the dispute must be genuine and not spurious, hypothetical or illusory.
For creditors, this means keeping the paper trail clean. For debtors, it means raising the dispute early and with evidence. We approach both sides of this issue every week.
Quality complaints, rejection of goods, counter-claims, penalty or set-off letters, earlier legal notices, pending civil suits, arbitration notices, and email exchanges on pricing or scope.
Choosing the right section decides whether the application survives admission.
| Point | Section 9 | Section 7 | Section 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Operational creditor | Financial creditor | Corporate debtor itself |
| Type of debt | Goods, services, employee dues | Financial debt | Any, debtor seeks insolvency |
| Prior notice | Mandatory Section 8 demand notice, 10 days | Recall notice usual, no statutory demand notice | Board and shareholder resolution |
| Minimum default | Rs 1 crore | Rs 1 crore | Rs 1 crore |
| Dispute as a defence | Pre-existing dispute defeats the application | Generally not, focus is on default | Not applicable |
| On Committee of Creditors | Operational creditors generally do not vote | Financial creditors form the CoC | Financial creditors form the CoC |
Related: IBC Section 7 lawyer · Experienced NCLT lawyer in Delhi · Money recovery lawyer in Delhi · Delayed payment lawyers
Section 9 cases often involve large supply chains, project payments and multiple parties. Our team has the depth to take them on.
Operational debt built up over many invoices, running bills and milestones, tracked and reconciled before filing.
Identifying the right corporate debtor, guarantors and group entities, and the right forum to pursue.
Opposed Section 9 petitions with dispute allegations, where evidence and drafting decide admission.
Taking orders on admission or rejection up to the NCLAT in New Delhi, and the Supreme Court where the matter warrants.
Section 9 pressure converted into negotiated settlement and recovery, documented so that it is enforceable.
Where Section 9 is the wrong tool, we move to summary suits, arbitration, DRT or the MSME Facilitation Council.
Businesses across construction, infrastructure, manufacturing and trading rely on our corporate and insolvency practice:
These decisions shape how the NCLT hears an operational creditor petition.
Set the pre-existing dispute test: a genuine, not spurious or illusory, dispute before the demand notice defeats a Section 9 application.
Dealt with the demand notice and the rule on operational creditor applications under Section 9.
Upheld the IBC's validity and the distinction between financial and operational creditors.
Held that the Limitation Act applies to IBC applications, with three years from default under Article 137.
Dealt with Section 10A and the bar on applications for defaults during the protected period.
An early ruling on how the adjudicating authority treats default in the corporate insolvency process.
Founder & Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed across Delhi's corporate and insolvency forums.
Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey is the Founder and Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm and an experienced NCLT lawyer in Delhi - with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. A graduate of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, he has built a distinguished corporate litigation practice representing creditors, corporate debtors, resolution applicants, and promoters in insolvency and company law disputes. His practice covers Section 7, 9 and 10 IBC applications, CIRP representation, resolution plans, liquidation, oppression and mismanagement, personal guarantor insolvency, and NCLAT appeals before the NCLT Delhi bench, NCLAT New Delhi, and the Supreme Court of India. Known for his precise, strategy-driven approach, Adv. Dubey is regularly sought by businesses and individuals across Delhi NCR facing high-stakes corporate and insolvency matters.
Associate Advocate with 6+ years specialising in Section 7 and 9 IBC applications, CIRP filings, and claims verification before the NCLT Delhi bench.
Associate Advocate with 6+ years in oppression and mismanagement matters, resolution plan review, and NCLAT appeals before Delhi's corporate law forums.
Straight answers on demand notices, filing, defending and appealing a Section 9 application in Delhi.
Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 allows an operational creditor to apply to the NCLT to start the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a corporate debtor that has not paid an undisputed operational debt. It is filed in Form 5 after a demand notice under Section 8 has gone unanswered for 10 days.
An operational creditor is a person to whom an operational debt is owed. Operational debt is a claim in respect of the provision of goods or services, including employment, or a debt in respect of dues payable under any law to the Central or State Government or a local authority. Suppliers, contractors, service providers and employees can be operational creditors.
A demand notice under Section 8 is the mandatory first step. The operational creditor serves a demand notice in Form 3, or a copy of the unpaid invoice with a notice in Form 4, on the corporate debtor, demanding payment of the unpaid operational debt. The debtor has 10 days from receipt to pay or to raise a dispute.
The application can be filed after the expiry of 10 days from the date of delivery of the demand notice, if the operational creditor has received neither payment nor a notice of dispute from the corporate debtor.
The minimum amount of default is Rs 1 crore, as notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs under Section 4 of the IBC in March 2020.
If the corporate debtor shows that a genuine dispute existed before the demand notice, or that a suit or arbitration on the same subject was already pending, the Section 9 application is liable to be rejected. The Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software held that the dispute must be real and not spurious, hypothetical or illusory.
The core documents are the invoices and purchase orders, proof of delivery of goods or services, the Section 8 demand notice with proof of service, an affidavit that no notice of dispute was received, a certificate from the bank of the operational creditor confirming non-payment, any information utility record, the ledger account and the Form 5 particulars.
The Adjudicating Authority is required to admit or reject the application within 14 days of receiving it. If the application is incomplete, the creditor gets 7 days to rectify the defect. In practice, listing and hearings can take longer.
The Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the IBC. Article 137 gives three years from the date of default, which can be extended by a written acknowledgement of the debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.
Unpaid dues for employment fall within operational debt, so an employee or a group of employees can file, subject to the Rs 1 crore minimum default. Employees often use other remedies as well, so the route needs a short strategy review.
The CIRP begins on the date of admission. A moratorium under Section 14 applies, an Interim Resolution Professional takes charge, a public announcement invites claims and a Committee of Creditors is formed from the financial creditors. Operational creditors do not sit on the Committee of Creditors unless there are no financial creditors.
Yes. Before admission, the NCLT can allow withdrawal. After admission, Section 12A allows withdrawal with the approval of 90 percent of the voting share of the Committee of Creditors. Settlements should be documented carefully.
Appeals lie to the NCLAT in New Delhi under Section 61, generally within 30 days, extendable by up to 15 days, and then to the Supreme Court under Section 62 within 45 days.
Not usually. Section 9 begins an insolvency process, so it needs a debt of Rs 1 crore or more and a debt that is not genuinely disputed. For smaller amounts or disputed invoices, a commercial summary suit, the MSME Facilitation Council or arbitration may fit better.
Common defences are a pre-existing dispute, payment, a defective demand notice, a debt below the threshold, limitation, the debt not being an operational debt, and defaults barred by Section 10A. A prompt, evidence-backed reply is crucial.
Global Vision Law Firm is led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey, with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed, including Section 7, 9 and 10 IBC applications, CIRP representation and NCLAT appeals.
This page is for general information on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and does not constitute legal advice. Thresholds, timelines and case law can change, and each matter turns on its own facts. Please consult an advocate before acting.
Unpaid dues or a Section 9 notice? Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years, 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. Free first consultation. Call now.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking the "Agree" button and accessing this website, the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members. Also, the information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.
Agree Decline