IBC Section 9 Lawyer Delhi | Operational Creditor Petition
Unpaid dues or a Section 9 notice? Talk to our insolvency lawyers: +91 9599801188 - Free First Consultation
NCLT Delhi · NCLAT New Delhi · Supreme Court · 13+ Years

IBC Section 9 Operational Creditor Petition Lawyer in Delhi

Global Vision Law Firm drafts Section 8 demand notices, files Section 9 IBC petitions and defends them before the NCLT in Delhi, through admission, CIRP and NCLAT appeal. Led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed, we act for suppliers, contractors, service providers, employees and corporate debtors, including in high-value, complex matters.

💼 Operational Creditor Petition📜 Section 8 Demand Notice📄 Form 5 Drafting⚖ Pre-Existing Dispute Defence🏛 NCLAT Appeals📍 Delhi NCR
Section 9 IBC Explained

What Is a Section 9 Petition Under the IBC?

Short answer

Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 lets an operational creditor apply to the NCLT to start the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a corporate debtor that has not paid an undisputed operational debt of Rs 1 crore or more. It is filed in Form 5, after a Section 8 demand notice has gone unanswered for 10 days.

Operational debt arises from the supply of goods or services, including employment. Suppliers, contractors, transporters, consultants and employees are the usual operational creditors. Where a company simply does not pay a clear, undisputed invoice, Section 9 is a strong lever.

Because admission triggers a moratorium and passes control to an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Section 9 gives creditors real pressure, and exposes debtors to real risk. The petition lives or dies on two things: a clean demand notice and the absence of a pre-existing dispute.

⚠ Section 9 is not for disputed invoices

If the buyer genuinely disputed quality, quantity or price before your notice, the NCLT will usually reject the petition. Before filing, we test your claim for any dispute trail in emails, complaints and replies, and advise on the better forum if one exists.

📌 Section 9 IBC at a glance

Who files
Operational creditor
Against
Corporate debtor (company or LLP)
Trigger
Unpaid, undisputed operational debt
Minimum default
Rs 1 crore (Section 4 notification)
First step
Section 8 demand notice (Form 3 or Form 4)
Wait period
10 days from delivery of the notice
Application
Form 5 with invoices, affidavit and bank certificate
Decision time
14 days to admit or reject (Section 9(5))
If defects
7 days to rectify before rejection
Limitation
3 years from default, unless extended
Appeal
NCLAT in 30 days (+15), then Supreme Court
Eligibility

Who Can File a Section 9 Operational Creditor Petition?

Any person owed an operational debt can be an operational creditor. Classifying the claim correctly is the first legal check.

📦

Suppliers & Vendors

Sellers of raw materials, goods, equipment or components owed unpaid invoices by a company.

🏗

Contractors & Sub-contractors

Construction, infrastructure and project contractors owed running bills, milestone and retention payments.

💼

Service Providers & Consultants

IT, logistics, manpower, consultancy and professional service providers with unpaid fees.

👤

Employees & Workmen

Unpaid wages, salary and employment dues are operational debt, subject to the minimum default.

🏛

Government & Statutory Dues

Dues payable under any law to the Central or State Government or a local authority also fall in the definition.

🤝

Joint Applicants

Several operational creditors can combine their dues against the same corporate debtor to cross the Rs 1 crore threshold.

📌 Lender or home buyer? Use Section 7 instead

A bank, NBFC, lender or home buyer owed a financial debt files under Section 7, not Section 9. We check the nature of the debt first. See our page on IBC Section 7 financial creditor petitions.

Mandatory First Step

Section 8 Demand Notice: Form 3 and Form 4

Before a Section 9 petition can be filed, the operational creditor must serve a demand notice under Section 8. It can be a notice in Form 3, or a copy of the unpaid invoice with a notice in Form 4. The notice must state the amount due and the demand for payment.

The corporate debtor has 10 days from receipt to do one of two things: pay the debt, or bring to the creditor's notice the existence of a dispute or a pending suit or arbitration filed before the notice. If neither happens, the creditor can file under Section 9.

⚠ A flawed demand notice can end the case

Wrong amount, wrong address, a notice that is not in the prescribed form or no proof of delivery are common reasons for rejection. We draft and serve the notice with tracked, provable delivery.

For Corporate Debtors

Received a Section 8 Notice? Reply Within 10 Days

A Section 8 notice is a warning, not yet a petition. A timely, accurate reply can stop a Section 9 application before it starts.

  • Dispute reply: if there is a genuine dispute, set it out with documents inside the 10 days.
  • Pending proceedings: point to any suit or arbitration filed before the notice on the same subject.
  • Proof of payment: attach bank records for any payment or part-payment made.
  • Do not ignore it: silence lets the creditor file, and admission changes control of the company.
  • Get advice early: call us the day the notice arrives: +91 9599801188.
Documents & Form 5

Documents Required to File a Section 9 Petition in Delhi

Section 9(3) lists the documents that must accompany Form 5. Missing items cause delay or rejection, so we build the file before filing.

Core

Invoices & Purchase Orders

Tax invoices, work orders or purchase orders that establish the operational debt and the amount claimed.

Core

Proof of Delivery or Performance

Delivery challans, e-way bills, acceptance certificates, measurement sheets or completion certificates.

Mandatory

Demand Notice with Proof of Service

Section 8 notice in Form 3 or 4, with postal, courier or email delivery records.

Mandatory

Affidavit on No Dispute

Affidavit that no notice of dispute has been received from the corporate debtor.

Mandatory

Bank Certificate of Non-Payment

Certificate from the financial institution maintaining the creditor's account confirming that the debt is unpaid.

Support

Ledger, Emails & Acknowledgements

Ledger confirmations, balance confirmations, TDS entries and emails acknowledging the dues. These also help on limitation.

  • Proposed IRP: name and consent of a proposed Interim Resolution Professional, if you propose one.
  • Information utility record of non-payment, if available.
  • Chronology and annexure index so the bench can find each proof quickly, and the prescribed filing fee.
Section 9 Process

Section 9 IBC Process and Timeline - Step by Step

From unpaid invoice to admission and CIRP, here is how our NCLT lawyers in Delhi carry a Section 9 matter.

1

Case Review & Dispute Check

We examine the debt, dates, communications and any complaint trail, and check for a pre-existing dispute and for limitation.

2

Strategy: Section 9, Summary Suit or MSME Route

We advise whether CIRP is right, or whether a commercial summary suit, arbitration or the MSME Facilitation Council fits better.

3

Draft & Serve the Section 8 Demand Notice

We prepare the notice in the prescribed form and serve it with provable delivery to the registered office.

4

The 10-Day Window

We watch for a reply, a notice of dispute or payment, and assess whether the window has closed cleanly.

5

Draft & File Form 5

We compile the documents under Section 9(3), the affidavit and bank certificate, and file before the NCLT bench with jurisdiction over the registered office.

6

Admission Hearing

The NCLT admits or rejects within 14 days of receipt. If defects are found, 7 days are given to rectify. We argue for admission, or for rejection when defending.

7

Moratorium, IRP & Claims

On admission, the moratorium starts, the IRP takes charge and creditors file claims in response to the public announcement.

8

CIRP, Settlement or Appeal

We represent the creditor or debtor through CIRP, negotiate settlements, and file or defend appeals before the NCLAT.

StageStatutory referenceTime
Demand notice servedSection 8(1)Starts the 10-day period
Debtor reply: pay or disputeSection 8(2)10 days from receipt
File application if no payment or disputeSection 9(1)After expiry of 10 days
Admit or rejectSection 9(5)14 days from receipt
Rectify defects after noticeProviso to Section 9(5)7 days
Communicate order to partiesSection 9(6)7 days from admission or rejection
Appeal to NCLATSection 6130 days, plus up to 15 days
Appeal to Supreme CourtSection 6245 days
The Decisive Issue

Pre-Existing Dispute: The Biggest Defence to Section 9

The most common reason a Section 9 petition fails is a pre-existing dispute. If a real dispute about the debt existed before the demand notice, or a suit or arbitration on the same subject was already pending, the NCLT will usually not admit the petition. The Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software held that the dispute must be genuine and not spurious, hypothetical or illusory.

For creditors, this means keeping the paper trail clean. For debtors, it means raising the dispute early and with evidence. We approach both sides of this issue every week.

📌 Where disputes are found

Quality complaints, rejection of goods, counter-claims, penalty or set-off letters, earlier legal notices, pending civil suits, arbitration notices, and email exchanges on pricing or scope.

For Corporate Debtors & Promoters

How to Defend a Section 9 Petition

  • Pre-existing dispute: a genuine dispute or pending proceeding before the demand notice.
  • Payment: the debt was paid or settled, with bank proof.
  • Defective notice or application: wrong form, wrong amount, missing affidavit or bank certificate.
  • Below threshold: the amount in default is below Rs 1 crore.
  • Limitation: the default is more than three years old with no acknowledgement.
  • Section 10A bar: defaults arising during the protected period of the pandemic are barred from CIRP.
  • Not an operational debt: the claim does not fit the statutory definition.
Section 7 vs 9 vs 10

Section 9 Compared with Section 7 and Section 10 IBC

Choosing the right section decides whether the application survives admission.

PointSection 9Section 7Section 10
ApplicantOperational creditorFinancial creditorCorporate debtor itself
Type of debtGoods, services, employee duesFinancial debtAny, debtor seeks insolvency
Prior noticeMandatory Section 8 demand notice, 10 daysRecall notice usual, no statutory demand noticeBoard and shareholder resolution
Minimum defaultRs 1 croreRs 1 croreRs 1 crore
Dispute as a defencePre-existing dispute defeats the applicationGenerally not, focus is on defaultNot applicable
On Committee of CreditorsOperational creditors generally do not voteFinancial creditors form the CoCFinancial creditors form the CoC

Related: IBC Section 7 lawyer · Experienced NCLT lawyer in Delhi · Money recovery lawyer in Delhi · Delayed payment lawyers

Track Record

High-Value & Complex Insolvency Matters, Handled to Result

Section 9 cases often involve large supply chains, project payments and multiple parties. Our team has the depth to take them on.

1400+
Cases Handled & Successfully Executed
13+
Years of Practice
3
Forums: NCLT, NCLAT, Supreme Court
9+
Expert Advocates
Scale

Large Supply & Project Dues

Operational debt built up over many invoices, running bills and milestones, tracked and reconciled before filing.

Complexity

Multi-Party & Group Companies

Identifying the right corporate debtor, guarantors and group entities, and the right forum to pursue.

Pressure

Contested Admission Hearings

Opposed Section 9 petitions with dispute allegations, where evidence and drafting decide admission.

Escalation

NCLAT & Supreme Court Appeals

Taking orders on admission or rejection up to the NCLAT in New Delhi, and the Supreme Court where the matter warrants.

Recovery

Settlement to Cash

Section 9 pressure converted into negotiated settlement and recovery, documented so that it is enforceable.

Strategy

Choosing the Right Forum

Where Section 9 is the wrong tool, we move to summary suits, arbitration, DRT or the MSME Facilitation Council.

Businesses across construction, infrastructure, manufacturing and trading rely on our corporate and insolvency practice:

  • Jagdish Construction Ltd
  • Dushad Infra Projects
  • G. K. Earth Movers
  • G K M Steels
  • Bharat Marble House
  • UNS Agri Serve Pvt. Ltd.
  • Jkumar Buildtech Private Limited
Law Behind Section 9

Key Supreme Court Judgments on Section 9 IBC

These decisions shape how the NCLT hears an operational creditor petition.

2017

Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software

Set the pre-existing dispute test: a genuine, not spurious or illusory, dispute before the demand notice defeats a Section 9 application.

2017

Macquarie Bank v. Shilpi Cable Technologies

Dealt with the demand notice and the rule on operational creditor applications under Section 9.

2019

Swiss Ribbons v. Union of India

Upheld the IBC's validity and the distinction between financial and operational creditors.

2018

B.K. Educational Services v. Parag Gupta

Held that the Limitation Act applies to IBC applications, with three years from default under Article 137.

2021

Ramesh Kymal v. Siemens Gamesa

Dealt with Section 10A and the bar on applications for defaults during the protected period.

2017

Innoventive Industries v. ICICI Bank

An early ruling on how the adjudicating authority treats default in the corporate insolvency process.

Our NCLT Expert

Meet Our IBC Section 9 Lawyer in Delhi - Adv. Amarendra Kumar Dubey

Founder & Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed across Delhi's corporate and insolvency forums.

Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey - IBC Section 9 Lawyer in Delhi
AD
⭐ IBC Section 9 Lawyer Delhi
13+ Years Experience
1400+ Cases Handled & Executed
Founder & Managing Partner

Adv. Amarendra Kumar Dubey

Corporate Litigation, NCLT/NCLAT, Insolvency & Banking Recovery · University of Delhi

Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey is the Founder and Managing Partner of Global Vision Law Firm and an experienced NCLT lawyer in Delhi - with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. A graduate of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, he has built a distinguished corporate litigation practice representing creditors, corporate debtors, resolution applicants, and promoters in insolvency and company law disputes. His practice covers Section 7, 9 and 10 IBC applications, CIRP representation, resolution plans, liquidation, oppression and mismanagement, personal guarantor insolvency, and NCLAT appeals before the NCLT Delhi bench, NCLAT New Delhi, and the Supreme Court of India. Known for his precise, strategy-driven approach, Adv. Dubey is regularly sought by businesses and individuals across Delhi NCR facing high-stakes corporate and insolvency matters.

NCLT Practice Areas
→Section 7 / 9 / 10 IBC Applications
→CIRP Representation
→Resolution Plans & Liquidation
→Oppression & Mismanagement
→Personal Guarantor Insolvency
→Mergers & Amalgamations
→NCLAT Appeals
Courts & Forums
⚖Supreme Court of India
⚖Delhi High Court
⚖NCLT Delhi (Principal Bench)
⚖NCLAT, New Delhi
⚖Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)
⚖Registrar of Companies, Delhi
⚖Commercial Courts, Delhi
Education
🏫
LL.B. - University of Delhi (2012)
Faculty of Law, University of Delhi
🏫
B.Sc. (Mathematics)
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University
Also Senior Legal Advisor at LegalFund - strategic dispute management for high-value corporate & insolvency claims.
Advocate Rohan Malhotra - NCLT Lawyer Delhi NCR
RM
Associate Advocate

Adv. Rohan Malhotra

6+ Years  ·  GGSIPU, Delhi  ·  Bar Council of Delhi

Associate Advocate with 6+ years specialising in Section 7 and 9 IBC applications, CIRP filings, and claims verification before the NCLT Delhi bench.

Section 7/9 IBC CIRP Filings Claims Verification NCLAT Appeals
Advocate Niharika Verma - NCLT Advocate Delhi
NV
Associate Advocate

Adv. Niharika Verma

6+ Years  ·  GGSIPU, Delhi  ·  Delhi HC Bar Association

Associate Advocate with 6+ years in oppression and mismanagement matters, resolution plan review, and NCLAT appeals before Delhi's corporate law forums.

Oppression & Mismanagement Resolution Plans NCLAT Appeals Mergers
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions - IBC Section 9 Operational Creditor Petition

Straight answers on demand notices, filing, defending and appealing a Section 9 application in Delhi.

Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 allows an operational creditor to apply to the NCLT to start the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a corporate debtor that has not paid an undisputed operational debt. It is filed in Form 5 after a demand notice under Section 8 has gone unanswered for 10 days.

An operational creditor is a person to whom an operational debt is owed. Operational debt is a claim in respect of the provision of goods or services, including employment, or a debt in respect of dues payable under any law to the Central or State Government or a local authority. Suppliers, contractors, service providers and employees can be operational creditors.

A demand notice under Section 8 is the mandatory first step. The operational creditor serves a demand notice in Form 3, or a copy of the unpaid invoice with a notice in Form 4, on the corporate debtor, demanding payment of the unpaid operational debt. The debtor has 10 days from receipt to pay or to raise a dispute.

The application can be filed after the expiry of 10 days from the date of delivery of the demand notice, if the operational creditor has received neither payment nor a notice of dispute from the corporate debtor.

The minimum amount of default is Rs 1 crore, as notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs under Section 4 of the IBC in March 2020.

If the corporate debtor shows that a genuine dispute existed before the demand notice, or that a suit or arbitration on the same subject was already pending, the Section 9 application is liable to be rejected. The Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations v. Kirusa Software held that the dispute must be real and not spurious, hypothetical or illusory.

The core documents are the invoices and purchase orders, proof of delivery of goods or services, the Section 8 demand notice with proof of service, an affidavit that no notice of dispute was received, a certificate from the bank of the operational creditor confirming non-payment, any information utility record, the ledger account and the Form 5 particulars.

The Adjudicating Authority is required to admit or reject the application within 14 days of receiving it. If the application is incomplete, the creditor gets 7 days to rectify the defect. In practice, listing and hearings can take longer.

The Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the IBC. Article 137 gives three years from the date of default, which can be extended by a written acknowledgement of the debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.

Unpaid dues for employment fall within operational debt, so an employee or a group of employees can file, subject to the Rs 1 crore minimum default. Employees often use other remedies as well, so the route needs a short strategy review.

The CIRP begins on the date of admission. A moratorium under Section 14 applies, an Interim Resolution Professional takes charge, a public announcement invites claims and a Committee of Creditors is formed from the financial creditors. Operational creditors do not sit on the Committee of Creditors unless there are no financial creditors.

Yes. Before admission, the NCLT can allow withdrawal. After admission, Section 12A allows withdrawal with the approval of 90 percent of the voting share of the Committee of Creditors. Settlements should be documented carefully.

Appeals lie to the NCLAT in New Delhi under Section 61, generally within 30 days, extendable by up to 15 days, and then to the Supreme Court under Section 62 within 45 days.

Not usually. Section 9 begins an insolvency process, so it needs a debt of Rs 1 crore or more and a debt that is not genuinely disputed. For smaller amounts or disputed invoices, a commercial summary suit, the MSME Facilitation Council or arbitration may fit better.

Common defences are a pre-existing dispute, payment, a defective demand notice, a debt below the threshold, limitation, the debt not being an operational debt, and defaults barred by Section 10A. A prompt, evidence-backed reply is crucial.

Global Vision Law Firm is led by Advocate Amarendra Kumar Dubey, with 13+ years of experience and 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed, including Section 7, 9 and 10 IBC applications, CIRP representation and NCLAT appeals.

This page is for general information on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and does not constitute legal advice. Thresholds, timelines and case law can change, and each matter turns on its own facts. Please consult an advocate before acting.

Need an IBC Section 9 Lawyer in Delhi?

Unpaid dues or a Section 9 notice? Global Vision Law Firm - 13+ years, 1400+ cases handled and successfully executed. Free first consultation. Call now.

📞
Call / WhatsApp

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking the "Agree" button and accessing this website, the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members. Also, the information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.